Even Trotsky in the Epstein Files
Strange bedfellows
Please note that this article has been corrected. It is not known who Bannon is alleged to have communicated with. However, it is not the point of this article which is highlighting Trotsky.I don’t want to comment on ‘strawberries’ or ‘Never shoot the woman’ in the exchange between Bannon and [redacted] in the Epstein file. I just want to note a mention which corroborates my sense that Leon Trotsky, especially in a corrupted form, suits minds that want to make a new world.
In the Department of Justice document, we see an interchange on 14 of March 2018 between Steve Bannon and [redacted] that suggest a common objective. It is not clear what that is exactly though China might seem relevant, but it is de-contextualised. The discussion finishes off with a note on Trotsky. Bannon often refers to revolutionary contexts.
Leon is perfect example of the cadre we can build- people who can actually ‘get things done’ who don’t have an apparatus that takes them seriously.- only wants their money
SB 10.59.09 am
[Redacted] gives a stunning retort - perhaps they were busy.
Uh Oh
10.59.99 am
Bannon replies.
Exactly-- my inner ‘Trotsky’ emerging
SB 11:00:28 am
[Redacted] feels a little impelled to reply in greater depth.
Not so inner
11.00.36.am.
A few minutes previously [redacted] had said
Leon doesn’t really understand world politics. The fact that billionaires sprung up so fast. Showed the way to hack the system […]
10:57:13 am
The figure of Trotsky is a critical figure to understand the present world context. He informs both left and right as a model of permanent revolution. In the context of the Middle East it is striking that Trotsky informed both intervention and opposition. I have long argued that billionaires are using techniques of Trotskyism to build a new technocracy. Trotsky was a revolutionary technocrat, see my latest work Trotsky vs Jesus. Trotsky and budding trillionaires are both anti-homeostatic globalist forces who will digitise the world as an earlier part of the exchange suggests.
This post contains marketing as images or links to my art or books could be classified as ads under EU law, even when included for reference and illustration.